KPI's service-areas

Service Failures to public 

Over all UK government service-area KPI's

 

Asylum accommodation

cost, hotel use, housing quality, transport, issue resolution

Clearsprings, Mears, Serco, Migrant Help

Contract cost rose from £4.5bn to £15.3bn; hotels made up 76% of cost but housed 35% of people; £4m deducted for underperformance since 2019.

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/83/home-affairs-committee/news/206734/national-audit-office-report-reveals-asylum-accommodation-cost-home-affairs-select-committee-to-question-accommodation-providers/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Health/disability benefit assessments

assessment timeliness, report quality, appeal outcomes

Atos, Capita, Maximus, Serco

NAO found Atos and Capita failed PIP assessment quality targets since 2013; wider criticism continued through DWP assessment reforms.

Contracted-out health and disability assessments

 

HMRC customer service

call answer rate, wait time, correspondence response, digital shift

Mostly in-house, with IT/support suppliers

NAO said taxpayers spent 7m hours waiting in 2022–23; average waits nearly 23 minutes in 2023–24; HMRC expected only 65–70% of callers to get through against an 85% target.

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/hmrc-customer-service.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Civil Service Pension Scheme administration

case backlogs, call handling, pension processing, complaints

MyCSP, Capita

PAC said customer service has been unacceptable since at least 2023 and criticised government failure to manage contracted administrators.

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/127/public-accounts-committee/news/209816/civil-service-pensions-report-lays-out-successive-govt-failures-in-scheme-administration/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Prisons

safety, cost per prisoner/place, assaults, staffing, performance ratings

Public prisons plus private operators including Serco, G4S, Sodexo

Government publishes annual prison performance ratings and cost data; prisons remain a high-risk service area.

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/prison-and-probation-trusts-performance-statistics?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Probation

risk assessment, reoffending work, staffing, vacancies

Now largely public after earlier outsourcing

PAC found only 28% of risk-of-harm assessments were adequate in 2024, down from 60% in 2018–19; probation officer vacancy rate rose to 21% by March 2025.

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/51386/documents/285278/default/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Public estate / facilities

building safety, maintenance backlog, service disruption

FM/PFI contractors vary by site

NAO warned building failures are affecting public-service delivery and government productivity.

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/maintaining-public-service-facilities.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

PFI schools/hospitals/infrastructure

asset condition, handback readiness, value for money

PFI contractors and special-purpose vehicles

Watchdog concerns that poor PFI management leaves government inheriting poor-quality assets.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jul/11/government-inheriting-poor-value-assets-due-to-bad-handling-of-pfi-contracts-watchdog-says?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Government procurement / common goods

savings, compliance, contract management, supplier performance

Crown Commercial Service frameworks, many suppliers

NAO says the public sector spent £407bn on goods and services in 2023–24; contract management remains a recurring weakness.

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Good-practice-guidance-managing-the-commercial-lifecycle.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Major outsourcing failure example

continuity of public services, supplier resilience

Carillion

Carillion collapsed in 2018 with major public contracts; recent enforcement actions against former directors show continuing fallout.

https://www.ft.com/content/0e4afd5a-f08b-497f-8b19-256ed2cbbf10?utm_source=chatgpt.com&syn-25a6b1a6=1

 

Biggest pattern

The repeated failure is not just bad contractors. It is often weak government contract management: poor KPIs, overreliance on supplier self-reporting, weak penalties, late intervention, and service users left with delays or poor outcomes.

The clearest current red flags are asylum accommodation, disability assessments, HMRC customer service, civil service pensions, probation, prisons, and public estate maintenance.

 

 

 

 

 

EHCP / SEND service areas — UK government KPI 

This is mainly England, because Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs) are an England system. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland use different SEND/additional-needs systems.

 

EHCP system overall

638,700 EHCPs in England at Jan 2025, up 10.8% from Jan 2024

Department for Education, local authorities, schools, health bodies

Demand keeps rising every year since EHCPs began in 2014.

https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/education-health-and-care-plans/2025?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

EHCP 20-week deadline

In 2023, only about 50% of new EHCPs were issued within the legal 20-week limit

Local authorities, educational psychologists, SEND teams

PAC said children are waiting too long; local authority on-time rates ranged from 1% to 100%.

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmpubacc/353/report.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

SEND appeals

Appeals rose from 6,000 in 2018 to 15,600 in 2023

SEND Tribunal, councils, legal reps

PAC said 98% of appealed decisions were found in favour of parents, showing low confidence and poor value for money.

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmpubacc/353/report.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Local authority SEND complaints

Ombudsman upheld 1,043 SEND complaints in 2024, up from 258 in 2021

Councils, outsourced SEND support where used

Successful complaints quadrupled in four years; many involved EHCP delays and failure to deliver provision.

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2025/feb/09/successful-special-educational-needs-complaints-in-england-quadruple-in-four-years?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Area SEND inspections

Ofsted/CQC carried out 54 full inspections by Dec 2024

Ofsted, CQC, local area partnerships

14 areas had widespread/systemic failings causing significant concerns.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/area-send-inspections-and-outcomes-in-england-as-at-31-december-2024/main-findings-area-send-inspections-and-outcomes-in-england-as-at-31-december-2024?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

National SEND system value for money

EHCP numbers rose 140% between 2015 and 2024

DfE, councils, schools, health bodies

NAO said the system is not delivering better outcomes, is financially unsustainable, and needs urgent reform.

Special Educational Needs system is financially ‘unsustainable’

 

Annual reviews

Must usually happen at least yearly

Councils, schools, SEND case officers

Ombudsman cases show major delays; one council had 1,146 overdue annual reviews in March 2024.

https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/education-law/394-education-news/99615-council-delayed-carrying-out-significant-number-of-ehc-plan-annual-reviews-in-2024-and-2025-ombudsman?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Therapy provision in EHCPs

Section F provision should be delivered once specified

NHS therapy services, councils, schools, private therapy providers

Ombudsman found cases where speech and language / occupational therapy in EHCPs was not delivered for long periods.

https://www.lgo.org.uk/decisions/education/special-educational-needs/25-007-774?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

 

Educational psychology assessments

EP advice is often needed before EHCP decisions

Council EP teams, private/agency EPs

Shortages and delays are a common cause of missed EHCP deadlines; Ombudsman cases show children losing specialist provision due to delayed assessments.

https://www.lgo.org.uk/decisions/education/special-educational-needs/25-005-863?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Specialist placements

Rising EHCP demand increases specialist placement pressure

State special schools, independent special schools, alternative providers

Lack of suitable placements causes children to be out of school, on reduced timetables, or waiting without lawful provision. NAO found the system under severe pressure.

Support for children and young people with special educational needs

 

Main contractors / providers involved

EHCP delivery is mostly a local authority statutory service, but many parts rely on external or semi-external providers:

 

Typical providers

Educational psychology reports

Council EP teams, agency/private educational psychologists

 

Speech and language therapy

NHS trusts, private SALT providers

 

Occupational therapy

NHS trusts, private OT providers

 

Specialist placements

Maintained special schools, academies, independent special schools

 

Alternative provision

PRUs, AP academies, private AP providers

 

SEND transport

Council transport teams, taxi/minibus contractors

 

Mediation / dispute resolution

Independent SEND mediation providers

 

Tribunal representation

Council legal teams, external law firms

 

Overall finding

The EHCP/SEND system is failing mainly on:

 

delays, missed legal deadlines, poor communication, failure to deliver provision written in plans, weak annual reviews, high tribunal losses, and postcode variation between councils.

The strongest official criticism is from the NAO, which said 

 

"the system is not delivering better outcomes and is financially unsustainable."

 

 

 

Over all Local council service areas — KPIs

(England) because that is where most national KPI data is published.

 

Adult social care

Ombudsman completed 950+ investigations in 2024–25 and upheld 79%

Care homes, home-care agencies, supported-living providers, brokerage systems, transport providers

Complaints rose 8%; charging complaints rose 28%; major issues include assessment, care planning, charging and safeguarding.

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.lgo.org.uk/assets/attach/6849/ASC-Review-2024-25-F.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Children’s services

Education and children’s services remain the largest Ombudsman complaint area

Children’s homes, fostering agencies, family support providers, legal services, assessment contractors

Complaints about children’s services still dominate Ombudsman casework; common issues include delay, poor communication and failure to provide lawful support.

https://www.lgo.org.uk/information-centre/news/2025/jul/children-s-complaints-still-dominate-ombudsman-casework-in-2024-25-but-housing-has-overtaken-adult-services?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

SEND / EHCP services

Successful SEND complaints quadrupled from 258 in 2021 to 1,043 in 2024

Educational psychologists, therapy providers, mediation providers, special schools, transport operators

EHCP delays, missed provision and weak annual reviews are recurring failures; only around half of EHCPs are issued within the 20-week legal deadline.

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2025/feb/09/successful-special-educational-needs-complaints-in-england-quadruple-in-four-years?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Homelessness / temporary accommodation

134,210 households in temporary accommodation on 31 Dec 2025, up 5% year-on-year

Temporary accommodation providers, hotels/B&Bs, nightly-let providers, homelessness IT systems

High use of temporary accommodation, costly nightly lets, out-of-area placements and unsuitable accommodation remain major public failures.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/statutory-homelessness-in-england-october-to-december-2025/statutory-homelessness-in-england-october-to-december-2025?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Housing complaints / repairs

Housing Ombudsman made 7,082 determinations in 2024–25, up 30%

Repairs contractors, damp/mould specialists, call centres, housing management systems

Poor complaint handling, disrepair, damp/mould, delays and weak resident communication are repeated problems.

https://www.housing-ombudsman.org.uk/annual-complaint-review-reports/annual-complaints-review-2024-25/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Waste and recycling

KPIs include missed bins, recycling rate, landfill/incineration, street cleanliness

Waste collection firms, recycling operators, street-cleaning contractors

Failures usually show as missed collections, poor complaint handling, contamination disputes and contract-performance issues.

 

Planning services

KPIs include application decision times, appeals, enforcement backlog

Planning portals, consultants, agency planners, legal support

Common failures include slow decisions, weak enforcement, poor neighbour notification and backlogs.

 

Highways / roads

KPIs include pothole repairs, road condition, claims, inspection frequency

Highway maintenance firms, resurfacing contractors, inspection systems

Poor road condition, delayed repairs and pothole claims are long-running public complaints.

 

Blue badges / parking / traffic enforcement

KPIs include application processing time, appeal rates, enforcement accuracy

Parking enforcement providers, permit systems, call centres

Failures include delayed blue badge decisions, incorrect penalties and poor appeals handling.

 

Council tax / benefits administration

KPIs include processing times, arrears collection, complaints, call waiting

Revenues-and-benefits software suppliers, debt collection agencies, contact-centre providers

Poor service often involves delays in housing benefit/council tax support decisions, aggressive debt recovery and poor vulnerability handling.

 

Public health / environmental health

KPIs include inspections, nuisance complaints, food hygiene visits

Pest control, lab testing, enforcement support, inspection systems

Delays in nuisance, noise, housing hazards and food enforcement complaints are common public concerns.

 

Leisure, libraries and community services

KPIs include usage, closures, cost, contract performance

Leisure operators, library systems, facilities management

Failures include service closures, reduced hours, poor building maintenance and weak outsourced contract monitoring.

 

Local transport / school transport

KPIs include punctuality, missed journeys, cost per user, complaints

Taxi firms, bus operators, SEN transport providers

SEND transport delays, missed pickups and safeguarding concerns are common complaints.

 

Corporate complaints / customer service

LGSCO dealt with 22,010 complaints and enquiries in 2024–25; upheld 83% of detailed investigations

Contact centres, CRM systems, outsourced complaint handling

Record complaints show residents are struggling with poor communication, delay and unresolved service failure.

https://www.lgo.org.uk/information-centre/news/2025/dec/ombudsman-publishes-annual-report-and-accounts-2024-25?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

Overall financial failure risk

The National Audit Office warned in 2025 that local government finances are becoming unsustainable, driven by demand and costs in services such as adult social care, children’s services, homelessness, waste disposal and debt costs.

Local government financial sustainability

 

Biggest public-service failure themes

The repeated problems are:

delays, poor communication, failure to meet legal duties, weak contractor monitoring, rising demand, staff shortages, unsuitable accommodation, missed SEND provision, poor repairs, and complaints not being fixed early.

 

 

 

DWP service areas — KPI's

Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)
No individual contractor names included

 

Failures to deliver / poor public service;

 

Universal Credit (UC)

Around 8.1 million people on UC (Sept 2025)

IT platform suppliers, payment processors, contact centres, debt recovery providers

High complaint volumes; 4,005 complaints in quarter ending Sept 2025; payment delays, advance debt pressure, sanctions disputes, mandatory reconsideration delays.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/dwp-complaints-statistics-to-september-2025/dwp-complaints-statistics-to-september-2025?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

DWP complaints overall

40% of closed complaints were upheld or partly upheld (Dec 2025 quarter)

Complaint handling systems, call centres, case review teams

Biggest complaint reason remains “You’ve got it wrong”; shows persistent decision accuracy and communication failures.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/dwp-complaints-statistics-to-december-2025/dwp-complaints-statistics-to-december-2025?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

PIP (Personal Independence Payment)

Around 3+ million claimants; high reassessment volumes

Assessment providers, medical evidence processors, paper review services

Long waits, disputed assessments, high appeal success rates, repeated criticism over report quality and claimant stress. NAO found quality problems persisted for years.

 

Work Capability / disability assessments

Timeliness, report quality, reconsiderations, appeals

Functional assessment providers, clinical reviewers, scheduling systems

Assessments repeatedly criticised for poor quality and inconsistency; delayed decisions affect income security and health outcomes.

 

State Pension

Over 12 million pensioners supported

Payment processors, pension admin systems, tracing services

Delays in pension correction cases, underpayment scandals, poor response times and long waits for correspondence resolution.

 

Carer’s Allowance / disability benefits

Decision times, overpayments, appeals

Benefit processing systems, payment suppliers

Overpayment recovery and complex eligibility rules create major complaint volumes and financial hardship.

 

Jobcentre Plus / employment support

Work coach caseloads, appointment timeliness, job outcomes

Employment support providers, appointment systems, security, facilities services

Staff shortages, inconsistent support, long waits, poor accessibility and complaint volumes around sanctions and missed appointments.

 

Employment programmes

Job outcomes, sustainment, cost per job outcome

Employability providers, training providers, support partners

Repeated value-for-money concerns where providers were paid despite weak long-term outcomes.

 

Child Maintenance Service (CMS)

1.1 million children covered; 800,000 arrangements; 75% of Collect & Pay parents paid something

Enforcement support, tracing services, income verification, payment systems

Slow enforcement, rising arrears, Direct Pay failures, high complaints, poor communication, domestic abuse concerns. NAO warned arrears could hit £1bn.

 

Debt management / benefit recovery

Recovery rates, complaint rates, affordability reviews

Debt collection systems, repayment processing

Complaints around affordability, aggressive recovery, hardship caused by deductions from benefit income.

 

Fraud and error control

Fraud detection rates, recovery, case review speed

Fraud analytics, investigation support, verification systems

False fraud flags, delayed suspensions, hardship from incorrect payment stops, long review delays.

 

Pension Credit / older claimant support

Take-up rates, processing times

Contact centres, eligibility verification

Low take-up and slow processing mean vulnerable pensioners missing support they are entitled to.

Biggest public failure themes

 

1. Delays

People wait too long for:

  • first payments
  • reassessments
  • mandatory reconsiderations
  • complaint resolution
  • appeals
  • disability decisions

 

2. Wrong decisions

The major complaint is:

“You’ve got it wrong”

This includes:

  • wrong calculations
  • incorrect sanctions
  • bad medical assessments
  • overpayment disputes
  • incorrect deductions

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/dwp-complaints-statistics-to-december-2025/dwp-complaints-statistics-to-december-2025?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

3. Communication failures

Examples:

  • unanswered calls
  • unclear letters
  • contradictory decisions
  • poor complaint handling
  • difficult digital access

4. Contractor oversight problems

Often the issue is not just the supplier—

but weak government oversight of:

  • quality
  • timeliness
  • escalation
  • safeguarding
  • complaints

5. Financial hardship caused by system delay

For many claimants, delay itself creates:

  • rent arrears
  • food insecurity
  • debt
  • missed therapy/support
  • worsening health

 

Wider government comparison

The National Audit Office.

 

Simple summary

DWP supports millions—

but the repeated public criticism is:

slow decisions + wrong decisions + poor communication

rather than lack of policy alone.

That is why DWP remains one of the most complained-about parts of UK government.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Family Courts and linked services — UK government KPI's

England & Wales focus (family court system under HMCTS + linked agencies)
No individual contractor names included

This covers the main family court services, KPI-style measures, supplier types, and where watchdogs found poor delivery or poor public service.

Private law children cases (child arrangements, contact, parental responsibility)

Average case duration remains a major KPI; delays remain significant across family courts

Court admin systems, digital filing suppliers, security, transcription, legal aid support services

Long delays causing children to go months or years without stable arrangements; repeated adjournments and listing problems create major public complaints

Public law care proceedings

26-week target remains key benchmark; many cases exceed this

Court services, expert witnesses, interpreters, guardians, legal aid providers

Delays mean children remain in unsafe or uncertain placements for too long; shortage of experts and judicial capacity increases delay

Domestic abuse injunctions (non-molestation / occupation orders)

Urgent listing times, order enforcement, victim safeguarding

Court listing systems, security, IDVA support services

Survivors report unsafe delays, poor urgent listing, inconsistent enforcement, and repeated contact with abusive parties

Financial remedy proceedings (divorce finance)

Waiting time to final hearing, enforcement success

Mediation providers, valuation experts, enforcement services

Very long waits for hearings, repeated disclosure disputes, delayed enforcement of orders, high legal cost burden

Child maintenance enforcement linked to courts

Liability orders, enforcement times, compliance rates

Enforcement support, tracing services, court enforcement systems

Long delays before enforcement; arrears continue rising while families wait for court-backed recovery

CAFCASS / child welfare reporting

Timeliness of safeguarding letters, section 7 reports, case allocation

Independent children’s guardians, report writers, admin systems

Delayed reports slow final orders; families complain of inconsistent safeguarding decisions and lack of continuity

Legal aid family services

Eligibility decisions, application processing, provider availability

Legal aid admin systems, advice providers

Many families struggle to access representation; legal aid deserts create unequal access to justice

Mediation services

MIAM attendance, mediation success rates

Accredited mediators, remote hearing systems

Mediation often inaccessible where abuse, complexity, or power imbalance exists; delays before mediation adds further court delay

Expert assessments (psychology, psychiatric, drug/alcohol, parenting)

Report turnaround time, expert availability

Independent experts, assessment centres, supervised contact providers

Delays due to lack of experts; families wait months for reports needed to progress cases

Contact centres / supervised contact

Availability, waiting lists, safeguarding compliance

Supervised contact providers, supported contact services

Long waits for supervised contact delay parent-child relationships; limited safe spaces available

Enforcement of child arrangements orders

Breach applications, enforcement speed

Enforcement services, court admin systems

Orders often seen as difficult to enforce; repeated breaches without timely consequence cause major frustration

Family court digital systems

Portal uptime, filing success, hearing notices

Digital platform suppliers, listing systems, call centres

Lost documents, delayed notices, hearing changes without notice, and inaccessible digital systems create major complaint volumes

Court buildings / hearing facilities

Building safety, room availability, hybrid hearing access

Facilities management, maintenance, security, video hearing systems

Cancelled hearings due to building issues, lack of rooms, poor remote hearing quality, accessibility failures

 

 

Biggest public failure themes

1. Delay

The biggest complaint across family courts is:

cases take too long

Examples:

  • child arrangements unresolved for years
  • delayed care decisions
  • repeated adjournments
  • long waits for fact-finding hearings
  • delayed enforcement of orders

Delay itself often becomes the biggest injustice.

2. Inconsistent safeguarding decisions

Families report:

  • conflicting recommendations
  • repeated staff changes
  • safeguarding concerns not acted on
  • poor domestic abuse risk handling

especially involving CAFCASS and linked assessments.

3. Enforcement weakness

A repeated criticism:

“orders exist but are not enforced”

especially for:

  • child arrangements
  • financial remedy orders
  • child maintenance
  • domestic abuse protections

4. Access to justice problems

Examples:

  • no legal aid available
  • unaffordable private representation
  • complex self-representation
  • digital exclusion
  • language barriers

This creates major inequality.

5. Poor communication

Examples:

  • hearing dates changed late
  • missing court papers
  • unclear directions
  • unanswered emails
  • no clear escalation route

 

Linked government bodies most commonly involved

Body

Role

HMCTS

runs the family courts

CAFCASS

safeguarding and welfare recommendations

DWP / CMS

child maintenance enforcement

Local authorities

care proceedings, safeguarding

Legal Aid Agency

funding for representation

Police

domestic abuse protection enforcement

Probation / prisons

linked safeguarding and contact restrictions

Housing / councils

homelessness linked to family breakdown

NHS / mental health services

expert evidence and safeguarding support

 

 

Complaint routes

Court administration problems

HMCTS complaint → escalation → final route via PHSO through MP

Judicial decisions

Usually cannot be complained about

→ must use:

  • appeal
  • set aside application
  • variation application

not Ombudsman

CAFCASS complaints

CAFCASS complaint → internal review → PHSO

Legal Aid Agency

LAA complaint → escalation → PHSO

Family court-linked local authority issues

Council complaint → LGSCO

Child maintenance issues

CMS → ICE → PHSO

Simple summary

The public criticism of family courts is usually:

too slow + too expensive + too hard to enforce

rather than just “bad decisions.”

For many families:

the delay becomes the real injustice

especially where children, abuse, housing, and finances are all linked at once.

Information icon

We need your consent to load the translations

We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.